For years, the pro-Israel lobbying group Aipac was a United States political juggernaut, but deepening voter disillusion over US-Israeli ties and wins by Israel-sceptic candidates in last week’s midterm elections have left it reeling.
Candidates of all stripes long courted the American Israel Public Affairs Committee’s support. But what was once an asset has become a liability in many races, as favourable opinions of Israel plummet over civilian deaths in Gaza and the costly Iran war.
In the Michigan Senate race, Aipac’s once irresistible force ran into an immovable object.
Democrat Abdul El-Sayed — who tapped into anger over US funding for Israel’s military — faced Aipac-supported candidates in the primary and general election, but emerged victorious to become the first Muslim
senator.
The tens of millions of dollars spent by an Aipac-affiliated group, the United Democracy Project, not only failed to beat El-Sayed, but they helped him boost his own messaging.
“To Aipac… Thank you for giving me the opportunity to beat you twice,” the Michigan politician said in his victory speech.
The tables flipped so completely that allies of El-Sayed’s Republican opponent, Mike Rogers, even asked the group to stop spending on him at one point.
“They definitely have become a liability,” said Adam Wood, a veteran Democratic campaign strategist with City & State Public Affairs, noting several campaigns he worked on in years past “coveted” Aipac’s support.
Another Democratic Senate success story, James Talarico, won in Texas with a similar message of ending US funding for Israeli offensive weaponry and keeping distance from Aipac.
“I’ve never taken money from Aipac, and I’m not taking money from Aipac in this campaign,” Talarico said early in his bid.
Officially, Aipac is non-partisan. It has traditionally supported candidates from the left and the right.
According to its website, it only accepts money from Americans and its board is composed exclusively of Americans.
But the group has become a byword in US politics for Washington’s tight ties with Israeli governments, including the outgoing far-right coalition of Benja-min Netanyahu.
The Chicago Council on Global Affairs has asked Americans to rate their favourability of Israel on a scale of 0 to 100 regularly since 1978 and this year marked a record low: an average score of just 44.
That’s down from 58 in 2022, when the previous midterms were held.
And for Democrats, the numbers are all the starker: a drop in favourability from 52 in 2022 to just 30 today.
“Democrats started to really tank on Israel,” said Dina Smeltz, a former State Department official who is now a managing director at the council.
Leftist Democratic star, Representative Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, has branded Aipac as “a right-wing organisation that undermines democracy”.
But support also appears to be faltering on the right.
On election day, President Donald Trump dialled into his favourite morning programme, Fox & Friends, and made the surprising announcement that the US would be ending a major annual aid package to Israel — something El-Sayed and others on the left have repeatedly demanded.
Vice-President J.D. Vance said he’d been told by a trusted pollster that his party’s road to recovery after the midterms annihilation will require, in part, changing “our relationship to Israel”.
And other right-wing voices, including broadcaster Tucker Carlson and libertarian Representative Thomas Massie, have criticised Israel in recent years in ways unimaginable in the 2000s and 2010s.
Pro-Israel lobbyists are not going to go away of course.
Aipac has competition from the left-leaning pro-Israel J Street as well as the recently formed pro-Palestine American Priorities super PAC.
The aftermath of elections in Israel, with the possible political eclipse of Netanyahu, could also help Aipac to find its feet again.
“It has been around for a long time. It has a lot of money,” Smeltz said.
The writer is from AFP